Budget response – November 2017

James Horniman, Partner, Portfolio Manager and Head of Professional Adviser Services

Compared to the drama of Brexit and potential political changes in Europe, today’s budget was a sideshow. It had some humour and even a magical rabbit out of the hat at the end for first-time buyers. It was a budget for all audiences ­– designed neither to unsettle nor over-excite

There was nothing on the dementia tax the Tories proposed in their manifesto; there was no return to addressing National Insurance inequalities between the employed and self-employed; there were no obvious changes to buy-to-let rules or to pensions. Even the much-vaunted threats to EIS seem to have been watered down, with EIS allowances for genuine growth projects actually doubled.

As the Office for Budget Responsibility finally resigned itself to the fact that Britain is not going to reach anything like 2% growth this side of 2022, the Chancellor was determined to present the impression that he was busy lighting the flames of growth – sparking productivity and innovation with a series of often quite meagre targeted expenditure announcements. This was no flame eating entertainment. At times it felt more akin to a boy scout rubbing sticks together in the rain.

That said, the investment in infrastructure, maths and computer science teaching, electric cars and the rest are to be welcomed. They are arguably the right things to be doing but will they be doused by the potential downpour of Brexit?

It was not just his shrinking budget headroom that was hampering Mr Hammond’s scope for manoeuvre, but his party’s frail majority and internal factions. Any idea remotely controversial or ambitious was clearly smothered long before it reached the floor of the House.

And maybe that is not such a bad thing. Higher-rate tax payers will no doubt be breathing sighs of relief. They did not want more meddling with tax relief on pension contributions.  They did not want erosion of salary sacrifice. They did not want IHT relief removed from the AIM market.

This was a budget for children and grandchildren. And arguably that is something that was long overdue.

Abolishing stamp duty on all houses under £300,000 for first-time buyers will benefit housebuilders and existing homeowners too. It is unlikely that all the benefit will feed through to the targeted recipients, but some should and it will help.

A commitment to building 300,000 homes a year by the 2020s could make a substantial difference to stemming rising property prices. Coupled with rising interest rates, it may be enough to prick the property bubble in areas like the South East, which in turn might encourage buy-to-let owners to sell up, releasing more homes on to the market. Certainly, now is the time to ask whether bricks and mortar are quite as secure as you thought.

Increasing the personal allowance by an extra £350 to £11,850 from April 2018 and raising the minimum wage and living wage will benefit the lower paid who naturally spend more of any savings. These measures are far more beneficial to the wider economy than cuts for the wealthy, who often simply save more. Ultimately everyone benefits because many retailers and other businesses benefit and so do their shareholders.

So this was a “steady as she goes” budget. It probably will not satisfy the millions who shocked Theresa May by voting Labour at the last election, but it will not unsettle those who voted Conservative either. It is difficult to see what choice the Chancellor had.

James Horniman

Posted 22nd November 2017

You should not act on the content of this market commentary without taking professional advice. Opinions and views expressed are personal and subject to change. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made of given by or on behalf of the Firm or its partners or any other person as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information or opinions contained in this document, and no responsibility or liability is accepted for any such information or opinions.

The value of an investment and the income from it can go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amount invested. This may be partly the result of exchange rate fluctuations in investments which have an exposure to foreign currencies. Fluctuations in interest rates may affect the value of your investment. The levels of taxations and tax reliefs depend on individual circumstances and may change. You should be aware that past performance is no guarantee of future performance.

More from this author

Should you sell your buy-to-let property?

When Capital Gains Tax (CGT) receipts broke records last year many commentators blamed it on disenchanted buy-to-let landlords cashing in their profits. Many buy-to-let investors are asking their financial advisers…

Should we be worried by Brexit deadlock?

Brexit campaigners promised us a financial nirvana if we left the EU. The Remain camp painted a Dante-esque picture of Britain sinking into economic squalor. We find ourselves somewhere in…

Why markets rollercoaster

New research in the US, just published in the journal “Chaos”, has uncovered why investing in the markets can be a rollercoaster ride. A team of researchers at the American…

The spirits of Christmas

After a successful year for technology stocks, James Horniman has clearly been thinking too much about the fundamentals of stock selection. Maybe it was reading A Christmas Carol to the children before…

The value of your investments and the income received from them can fall as well as rise. You may not get back the amount you invested.

James Hambro Menu